Avoid These Common Mistakes in the McKinsey Problem-Solving Game (PSG)
Avoid These Common Mistakes in the McKinsey Problem-Solving Game (PSG) Facebook Reddit Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Table of Contents Brief overview
Have you ever wondered how the scoring system of the McKinsey PSG works and how it affects your final result?
The McKinsey Problem Solving Game (PSG) is a digital assessment that has left many candidates puzzled about its scoring mechanism. Unlike its paper-based counterpart, the McKinsey Problem-Solving Test (PST), which follows a straightforward scoring system based on the number of correct answers, the PSG scoring is more complex. It combines both the final score and the process score, making it essential for candidates to understand how it works to improve their gameplay strategy and enhance their chances of success in the case interview.
In its current format, the Imbellus presents you with a choice of 6 mini-games, out of which you play 2. The duration of the PSG ranges between 60 and 81 minutes, challenging your problem-solving abilities within a limited time frame. Since March 2023, the preferred games in the PSG have shifted to Ecosystem Building and Redrock Study, replacing the previous Ecosystem and Plant Defense games.
The instant you complete the PSG, you can make a quick estimation of your performance without waiting for the official notification. To assess your performance in the Ecosystem Building game, aim to create a sustainable solution within 30 minutes. If you can achieve this feat, you stand a decent chance of securing a good PSG score. In the Plant Defense game, surviving is the ultimate goal. Aim to last for a minimum of 15 turns in each round, ideally surpassing 25 or even 30 turns.
To evaluate candidates, the PSG employs both product scores, representing the final results achieved, and process scores, which assess the candidate’s approach to obtaining those results.
The product scores in the McKinsey PSG evaluate your level of success in achieving the objectives of the game scenarios. While there is no single correct answer, certain solutions will yield better results than others. In the first scenario, the product scores are based on the number of species that survive, considering factors such as energy consumption and provision. In the second scenario, the score is determined by the number of turns you survive until the end.
Process scores are derived from the analysis of your patterns and actions throughout the entire game-playing process, including keystrokes, clicks, and mouse movements. Although McKinsey has not explicitly disclosed the exact measurement method for process scores, it is crucial to assume that every action on the screen reflects your problem-solving approach. To optimize your process scores, it is essential to adopt a well-thought-out strategy from the beginning. Train yourself to approach problems analytically and systematically, allowing your actions to naturally align with desired problem-solving behaviors.
The Imbellus platform presents a diverse array of games, each demanding its own unique approach and mindset. For a step-by-step guide on winning strategies, be sure to explore the McKinsey PSG Simulation.
Embark on the Ecosystem Building game, where your task is to construct a robust food chain pyramid by thoughtfully selecting 8 species, including animals and plants. Employ these strategies to optimize your performance:
In the Plant Defense game, your objective is to safeguard a vulnerable plant from invading species. Utilize these strategies to create an impenetrable defense:
Uncover the mysteries of the Red Rock Study game with these winning strategies:
Although the following games are no longer part of the PSG, we provide insights into their strategies to ensure preparedness for any unexpected scenarios.
Take charge of organizing the migration of 30 to 50 animals from one location to another within a limited timeframe of 3 to 5 turns. Ensure successful migration with these strategies:
While the PSG score is a vital component of the screening stage, it alone cannot determine whether you pass or fail. McKinsey does not reveal your test results; instead, you receive an email notifying you if you have advanced to the consulting case interviews. No explanations, criticism, or component scores are provided, making it challenging to assess your performance.
The final decision to advance to the next rounds is based on multiple factors, including your performance in the interview screening and the Solve game, as well as the evaluation of your resume. The PSG results are taken into consideration alongside the rest of your application. McKinsey recruiters evaluate your overall profile, including your resume and cover letter, before making a decision. A high PSG score can compensate for a weaker resume, while a non-optimal PSG performance can be offset by an impressive consulting resume.
Although controversies surround the significance of the PSG score in the overall selection process, there are several reasons why a high score can be advantageous in McKinsey recruitment.
McKinsey is known for its highly competitive nature, with a low passing rate for the PSG. According to various consulting preparation sites, the passing rate typically ranges from 20% to 30%. To stand out among thousands of applicants, it is crucial to aim for a score that places you in the “safe zone” and increases your chances of advancing to the next stage.
If you come from a non-business background or your resume lacks a standout element, a good PSG score can effectively demonstrate your potential as a consultant. Achieving a high score showcases the qualities required of a McKinsey consultant, enabling hiring managers to make a more comprehensive decision and offer you an interview opportunity.
The PSG, particularly the ecosystem-related mini-games, requires strong numerical and verbal aptitude to quickly analyze vast amounts of data. Developing mental math and fast reading skills is crucial for success not only in the PSG but also in case interviews and real consulting work. Practice exercises to improve your mental calculation speed and enhance your reading comprehension skills.
Candidates with experience playing video games, especially strategy games, have an advantage due to their developed “game sense.” Video games that involve data processing and system management can enhance the necessary skills for the PSG. The logic and gameplay of the McKinsey PSG share similarities with certain popular video game genres. Practicing with similar games can sharpen your problem-solving abilities and familiarize you with the strategic thinking required to excel in the PSG.
Understanding the scoring mechanism of the McKinsey Problem Solving Game is crucial for candidates aiming to succeed in the highly competitive world of McKinsey recruitment. The PSG score, comprising both product scores and process scores, plays a significant role in the screening process. While a high PSG score does not guarantee advancement, it can support your resume and showcase your potential as a consultant.
By familiarizing yourself with the PSG scoring system, optimizing your gameplay strategy, and honing your problem-solving skills, you can increase your chances of success in the McKinsey recruitment process. Embrace the challenge, decode the scoring system, and unlock your full potential in the McKinsey Problem Solving Game. Good luck on your journey to consulting excellence!
Avoid These Common Mistakes in the McKinsey Problem-Solving Game (PSG) Facebook Reddit Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp Table of Contents Brief overview
This article aims to provide you with valuable tips and strategies to help you master the Ecosystem Building game and
In the realm of job assessments and recruitment, McKinsey & Company, a renowned global management consulting firm, has introduced an